Points are:

• Chronicle analysis on weblogs and interview
• Counting the words I define
• Nexus among context and essence I pick up

How do I linkage my analysis with conclusion? I would like to do so in the chronical analysis on blog and interviewing. In the way, I am gonna show you how the motivation, identification and self-understanding of interviwee are changing.

And I have to fix the linkage among theory (approach), concepts (analytical concepts from theories) and terms I defined for analysis from the concepts. It has to be legitimate for using the concepts and terms.

How do I use the terms? I would like to use the terms for counting the elements of content in the interviews, blogs and posts in the BBS and online communities. As a result, I will show the tendency of identities’ transformation from these cases. And I have to be care about qualitative specificity: that means, how do I make linkage A element in data with B element. To speak in detail, is possible B the context of A. When I want to pick up A essence from the data, quantitative method excludes the other elements. But in the qualitative way, I include the other elements as the background of the main essence that I want to prove something.